12. Reading & Writing

Click to hear podcast

   Reading

Upon Mrs. Browslowski's request we took out our specially selected library book and began to read. I chose The Babe Ruth Story, turned to the first page, and glanced at the words in chapter one.  The room was very quiet with the only sounds an occasional cough and page-turning. It was an age-appropriate book but the printed words for some reason did not register in my mind that day, and I was panic-struck because everyone was immersed in reading.

Mrs. Browslowski maneuvered around the room to check on our progress and asked how we were doing. When she came to my desk, my lips quivered and barely eked out a response. She leaned close to my face and asked what was wrong. "I see the words, but they don't make sense – what am I doing wrong?"  Hopefully nobody saw the tears flow down my cheeks as she said: "Dear, you have to allow the words to make a picture in your mind." She had me re-read the first paragraph and explain what I "saw". I am not sure if it was her compassion or the comment, but the words gradually began to produce a picture in my mind as I finished the page and then the chapter. That important moment in third grade served as a catalyst to transform symbols on a page into images in my brain, and I finished the book that evening.

The school emphasized reading and took us to the neighborhood library to explain the card catalogue system, how to check out books, and the many selections available. In the following years in elementary school, I would secure unabridged classics and read: The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn, Moby-Dick, 20,000 Leagues Under the Sea, The Adventures of Tom Sawyer, Treasure Island, Robinson Crusoe, and more, and found that the images in my mind were vivid and reading was engaging. The more I read, the more lucid the images became.

Reading draws on an attentive mind. It is not the vocal, interactive activity discussed in previous chapters but rather an act of the will to keep the eyes fixed on a page and the mind cognitively primed to receive information for comprehension. You must be disciplined to read at various levels: for pleasure, grasping themes, and character analysis and those classics were read for pleasure, but required patience to concentrate for extended periods, scrutinize small font, and follow the story line. The inspired reading perpetuated the dopaminergic effect through the page-turning but I was also drawn in by the exceptional writing skills of Mark Twain, Herman Melville, Jules Verne, Robert Louis Stevenson, and Daniel Defoe. I empathized with the characters and was transformed while internalizing human values, frailties, triumph, good, and evil. It was more profound than television because the words embraced ideas with much greater depth and analysis. These were phenomenal writers that knew how to capture the imagination of an audience through exceptional language and identification with the human condition. I was a better person for reading their books.

The curriculum in junior and senior high schools went a step further than the reading in elementary school and required analysis of poems, novels, and plays from traditional British and American writers. We evaluated characters, themes, literary devices, setting, and narrative. Not only was this sustained reading, but in-depth scrutiny, too. We had to understand the literal and interpretive meaning of the passages and then categorize our thoughts in the context of characters, themes, literary devices, setting, and narrative. Furthermore, it was not only performed in the context of classroom discussion but in written form and our English teachers maintained the same depth of problem solving as our mathematics teachers, but was right-brain centric (metaphorical, aesthetic, contextual) as described by Daniel Pink earlier. The research studies below reveal the regions targeted in the brain during assorted reading and writing activities.

Reading stays in your mind

Scientists have learned that reading is not just the literal scanning of words but an analytical cognitive exercise. In a study conducted by Gregory Berns, director of Emory University's Center for Neuropolicy, twelve female and nine male students volunteered to read one chapter a day of Pompeii, by Richard Harris, the 2003 fictionalized account of the destruction of the city after the eruption of Mount Vesuvius in 79 A.D.

They were scanned for thirty minutes a day before reading, the morning after reading a chapter, and then for five days after completion of the novel and given a quiz on the previous evening's reading to assure that the assignments were done. Berns found spikes in two regions after chapters were read: left temporal cortex, a region associated with language comprehension, and the central sulcus, area of sensation and movement, but also identified spikes in participants five days after the novel was completed.

Based on the fMRI data, Berns concluded, particularly the data from the sensation and movement regions, that stories linger in our minds as we become empathetic with the main characters, projecting ourselves into their being, a "shadow activity", not unlike a muscle memory to perform a task. The more profound the narrative, the stronger the effect. He adds:

Stories shape our lives, and, in some cases, help define a person, reconfiguring brain networks for at least a few days. It shows how stories can stay with us. This may have profound implications for children and the role of reading in shaping their brains.1

I found the imagery and mental exercise of reading in my English and history classes in high school and college to be as challenging as solving problems in science and math courses. In that context, a study conducted by Noreen O'Sullivan at England's University of Liverpool, examined the intricacy of reading complex literature, particularly poetry, recruiting twenty-four first or second year undergraduate students (sixteen female) enrolled in English classes. Her experiment included two parts, the first used fMRI, like Berns, but had the participants read forty-eight four-line stanzas ranging in complexity from simple prose to poetry. They were not scanned in the second part, but rather reflected on the passages, rating them on "poetic quality", and reappraised their original interpretation.

Literary Awareness

O'Sullivan's fMRI scans identified enhanced regions in the brain during the initial reading and reflective stages of the exercise. Secondly, by numerically evaluating the degree of sophistication, or 'poetic' quality to the verses, O'Sullivan found brain activity covered a range of cognitive functions (memory, reward, visceral, reasoning, and empathy) that correlated with the sophistication of interpretation. That is, the students compared the complexity of the verses to derive a "literary awareness" rating with the highest scores ascribing greater complexity differentials between the poetry and simple prose stanzas. People that are more aware of the nuances in complexity have a greater capacity, therefore, to derive meaning in text that is applied in future analysis.
How is her data relevant to the engaged child themes of this book?

1.  Purposeful understanding of poetic or complex prose requires focused attention of "multiple meaning threads" in the brain.
2.   The novelty of processing a piece of literature requires pondering and not only uses the brain's memory apparatus but regions that perform deeper analysis.
3. Evaluating complex literature improves literary competency. The dopaminergic effect increases during such appraisal because individuals find the task fulfilling, resulting in enhanced concentration, mental flexibility, and awareness.2

Whereas Berns' volunteers were scanned the morning after they read increments from Pompeii, O'Sullivan's team went steps further by scanning the reading act and later accumulated subjective opinions about the complexity of their poetry and prose. Both groups showed brain enhancements because of reading, but O'Sullivan revealed interplay between sectors in the brain as 'poetic' complexity was interpreted and comments:

In complex texts, the meaning behind events travels through subtle shifts, sometimes leading to an internal state where multiple possibilities are compatible. It is in this complexity that serious literature has a greater capacity to emulate what it is really like to be human: the thoughts, feelings, and behaviors of imperfect characters become understood in relation to their sociocultural context. This will have intrinsic therapeutic benefits that should include improved, adaptive social functioning. We argue that active reading of complex literary pieces may benefit wellbeing by encouraging a more responsive and flexible information processing style that mimics reasoning in everyday life.2

Curriculum specialists recognize the value of liberal arts education because courses outside the area of concentration, a major, make you 'well-rounded', value scholarship, and become sensitive to the broad academic world of content areas. O'Sullivan is showing that more complicated reading forces the brain to work in varied regions to simultaneously couple multiple ideas with interpretation to bolster memory for future analysis. Furthermore, she and Berns are saying that focused reading gives meaning to characters and words, producing more empathetic beings. The idea is that students have sufficient opportunities to nurture those cognitive processes as they examine complex texts, becoming not only proficient in their area of concentration, but higher levels of social reasoning. The consequence of attentive reading is verified by cellular changes in the brain in both information and emotion centers.

Parents are performing a great service by reading to their children during the preschool years since it manifests in advanced vocabulary, word recognition, adaptation of written words to spoken vocabulary, reading comprehension, and fluent and accurate word recognition.3,4

Writing

One of the most important samples of penmanship is the stylish signature of John Hancock, the first signer of the United States Declaration of Independence August 2, 1776. In fact, by the mid-1700's handwriting and penmanship schools were established. People enrolled in these institutions to become professional copiers of land deeds, birth and marriage certificates, and other legal documents. Not only was Hancock's signature visible at the bottom, but Timothy Matlock was commissioned to write the final copy of this historic text.

Archeological evidence reveals that Samaria, Egypt, and China had codified systems of standard symbols that recorded events and documented discoveries in the areas of medicine, mathematics, science, literature, and music thousands of years ago. Whether it was carved into stone or neatly scripted with a pen, writing has been a significant element in human culture to transmit information to contemporary and future communities. It remains a significant part of the education of our children and is crucial for transmitting creative and pragmatic information to the world.

Writing couples fine motor and other brain circuits

In recent years, cursive has evolved to typing on keyboards, and human documentation is thriving more than ever. The handwritten document has evolved to a digitized format that is easily replicable by publishers for preview and editing. You no longer must use an eraser or ink-removal liquid to correct a document but can delete or move highlighted letters or entire passages to record information anew.

The human brain apparently has the capacity to manipulate words and derive meaningful statements that are either vocalized or recorded on paper or a computer in sentences that are comprehended by others. In recent years, scientists have scanned the brains of subjects as they performed the writing act and discovered that a host of regions are appropriated.

For one, learning cursive integrates regions of the brain associated with sensation, controlled movement, and thinking. The child uses fine motor skills as the fingers grasp and manipulate the implement, an extension of the thinking process as ideas are formulated, and then decides how it will be recorded on paper. Karin James, professor of psychological and brain sciences at Indiana University, had preliterate, five-year old children print, type, and trace letters and shapes, and scanned with fMRI when they were later shown images of the items. Though their clumsy replications were what you would expect of first trials, the writing circuit in both hemispheres of their brains was significantly activated when the children performed handwriting and not typing or tracing. It was the same "reading network" observed when adults write, particularly the fusiform gyrus and posterior parietal regions of the brain. The authors concluded:

Their brains don’t distinguish letters; they respond to letters the same as to a triangle. Handwriting is important for the early recruitment in letter processing of brain regions known to underlie successful reading. Handwriting therefore may facilitate reading acquisition in young children.5

In another study, Virginia Berninger, professor emeritus at the University of Washington's Interdisciplinary Learning Disabilities Center, found that children in elementary school recorded more words and ideas when handwriting to create essays compared to keyboarding. She states:

This myth that handwriting is just a motor skill is just plain wrong. We use motor parts of our brain, motor planning, motor control, but what’s very critical is a region of our brain where the visual and language come together, the fusiform gyrus, where visual stimuli actually become letters and written words. You have to see letters in the mind’s eye in order to produce them on the page.

Berninger also noted in her research that students should be "hybrid writers", learning manuscript first for reading and word recognition, then cursive development with its connecting strokes in formulating words to improve spelling and stream of conscious during composing, and eventually touch-typing.

Using a keyboard, and especially learning the positions of the letters without looking at the keys might well take advantage of the fibers that cross-communicate in the brain, since unlike with handwriting, children will use both hands to type.6,7

Writing embraces creative centers

Martin Lotze, of the University of Greifswald in Germany, used fMRI while adults recorded stories. To get a baseline reading he asked the twenty-eight volunteers to copy some text from a book. At that point, they were instructed to read sentences from a short story, brainstorm for a minute, and then write a continuation with their own words for over two minutes. The scans revealed processing in the visual cortex during the brainstorming minute but noted activation in the hippocampus, the memory retrieval center during the creative writing phase as well as in the frontal cortex area as the brain was simultaneously processing character and plot.

Lotze then performed the same investigation on twenty experienced ten-year writers at the University of Hildesheim creative writing contest. Compared to the novice writers these competitive individuals used a different strategy that activated their speech centers ("articulation-related aspects of sentence generation") during the brainstorming, that is, narrating their thoughts with an inner voice as they prepared their fingers to write. Their frontal cortex was stimulated, too, in the left caudate nucleus in a manner that Lotzea described as

…increased cognitive control and skill automatization processing reflecting on their proficiency as readers. Furthermore, they executed many decisions, strategies, relevant and well-learned skills (e.g., writing performance, language skills, sentence construction), and attaining domain specific goals (e.g., characteristics of literary genres, engaging the readers' interest) in an automatic, unconscious and intuitive way. The left caudate nucleus is used for deep analysis like that of a scientist, or individuals who specialize in tasks, like board games.8

Conclusion

Reading and writing allow students to manage their thought processes, building confidence as competent literary beings. Recent research has examined the activated regions in the brain and substantiates the significance of these activities in the literacy education of children. Furthermore, more practice incorporates memory, analysis, creativity, and social awareness.


1
The processes associated with reading or writing affect the brain in many regions encompassing synchronized cognition in the areas of memory, comprehension, sensation, literary awareness, wellbeing, social awareness, speech, and visual acuity.


2
The analytical and reflective elements become more operative with practice.


3
Teachers and parents should motivate children to enjoy reading and writing to nurture those habits for extended periods during their free hours. The Harry Potter series by J. K. Rowling has stimulated throngs of children (and adults) to read for many continuous hours. Like me, when I was drawn in with the likes of The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn, Moby-Dick, and 20,000 Leagues Under the Sea, it was "impossible to put the books down" because the images and plots created by the authors were vivid and addicting. Endurance reading and writing strengthen attentiveness, and as Berns stated: "reconfigures brain networks for at least a few days. It shows how stories can stay with us"1 as well as O'Sullivan's comment: "has intrinsic therapeutic benefits that should include improved, adaptive social functioning."2


4
Reading and writing assignments that designate specific goals and objectives promote focus, serving to intensify the dopaminergic effect, thus sustaining concentration to complete tasks. It is analogous to word search puzzles where the mind is focused and couple diverse cognitive skills to find the letters. Carefully constructing prompts will enable students to incorporate "multiple meaning threads"2 during the assignment.


5
Annotating text amplifies concentration because the individual is examining content to find relevant and interesting facts and ideas as underlining and jotting notes in the margins serve to organize the script for later analysis as noted in the article, I'll Have Mine Annotated, Please: Helping Students Make Connections with Texts.9


6
Requiring students to write summaries, answer questions, or do further analysis after a reading assignment intensifies understanding and uses higher level cognitive processing such as analysis, application, and synthesis, what O'Sullivan calls "multiple meaning threads"2.


7
Encourage students to read newspaper and magazine editorial sections to examine the evidence and look for arguments from all perspectives.10


8
Recognize the needs of the broad range of reading aptitudes because many students are slow readers and assign accordingly. The leisurely pace while reading a novel for pleasure has a different perspective than reading a document for history class or a Shakespearean play for English. A set of objectives and questions will clarify what is to be emphasized, stimulating the dopaminergic effect because the assignment is goal-structured and manageable. They are likely to highlight sections relevant to your objectives.11


9
Students must be instructed on how to find answers to their questions and perform searches through the various engines on the Internet. Fortunately, the world-wide web is replete with information, though some is biased or inaccurate. Learning how to sort through the many articles is daunting but when done in a purposeful manner provides a wealth of knowledge and insight.12


10
Students benefit greatly from teacher editing because feedback, suggestions, and praise refines the evaluative process and furthers the student's path toward more advanced writing in terms of punctuation, spelling, organization, relevance, and clarity. Colin Monaghan gives many valuable tips on how feedback can improve writing by your students. 13


11
Encourage young people to maintain a journal to generate a stream of consciousness for sustained periods, process daily events and emotions, and document aspirations as part of Jenifer Fox's creative dreaming, an emphasis that departs from the facts-only school perspective so that they can investigate their strengths and likes.14


  


The art of doing twice as much in half the time

I recently visited a school in the Netherlands where the kids have been trained to self-learn. The bell would ring, and they would come running into the room; teams of four run to the wall and put up their scrub boards on the wall; have a short meeting. What did we do yesterday? What will we do today? They run to the desk and start to work. The teacher is just standing there saying nothing. The enthusiasm of these kids was so overwhelming. I'm standing there with other teachers who are crying. The kids say it's faster learning, better grades, they finish weeks early, they have more fun; the motivation problems go away; the disciplinary problems go away; the team executes self-discipline.

Jeff Sutherland, software developer and author
TED Talks


References

1.       Berns GS, Blaine K, Preitula MJ, and Pye B., (2016). Short- and Long-Term Effects of a Novel on Connectivity in the Brain. Brain Connectivity.
2.       O'Sullivan, N., Davis, P., Billington, J., Gonzalez-Diaz, V., Corcoran, R., (December 2015) “Shall I compare thee”: The neural basis of literary awareness, and its benefits to cognition, Cortex, Volume 73, 144–157.
3.       Worland, J., (April 27, 2015).  This Is What Happens When You Read to a Child, 2017 Time Inc.,
          Retrieved from:
          http://time.com/3836428/reading-to-children-brain/
4.       Brown, J., (June 24, 2014).  I is for infant: Reading aloud to young children benefits brain development, PBS NewsHour,
          Retrieved from:
          http://www.pbs.org/newshour/bb/infant-reading-aloud-young-children-benefits-brain-development/
5.       James, K.H. and Engelhardt, L. (2013).  The effects of handwriting experience on functional brain development in pre-literate children. Trends in Neuroscience and Education.
6.       Berninger, V. (January 23, 2012).  Evidence-Based, Developmentally Appropriate Writing Skills K–5: Teaching the Orthographic Loop of Working Memory to Write Letters So Developing Writers Can Spell Words and Express Ideas. Presented at Handwriting in the 21st Century? An Educational Summit, Washington, D.C.,
7.       Klass, P. (June 20, 2016).  Why Handwriting Is Still Essential in the Keyboard Age, New York Times,
          Retrieved from:
          http://well.blogs.nytimes.com/2016/06/20/why-handwriting-is-still-essential-in-the-keyboard-age/
8.       Erharda, K., Kesslerb, F., Neumanna, N., Ortheilb, H., Lotzea, M., (October 2014).  Professional training in creative writing is associated with enhanced fronto-striatal activity in a literary text continuation task, NeuroImage, Volume 100, 15, 15–23.
9.       Brown, M., (March 2007).  I'll Have Mine Annotated, Please: Helping Students Make Connections with Texts, The English Journal 96(4):73.
10.     Newspaper Association of America Foundation, (2007).  Newspapers Maintain the Brain. A Teacher's Guide for Using the Newspaper to Enhance Basic Skills, 5-11. Vienna, VA
          Retrieved from:
          http://www.readingrockets.org/article/teachers-guide-using-newspapers-enhance-language-arts-skills
11.     Creating Study Guides for Reading Assignments, (2010). Academy of Art University. Faculty Development
          Retrieved from:
          http://faculty.academyart.edu/content/dam/faculty/assets/pdf/planning-your-class/assignments/StudyGuidesReadAssgmts.pdf
12.     MacDonald, W., Research Using the Internet, Academic Skills Centre, UTM Library   
          Retrieved from:
          http://www.writing.utoronto.ca/advice/reading-and-researching/research-using-internet
13.     Monaghan, C., Give your students better writing feedback. A practical guide for instructors.,
          Retrieved from:
          http://www.betterwritingfeedback.com/
14.     Fox, J., (2007) Your Child's Strengths: Discover Them, Develop Them, Use Them, Viking Press.